In August, The Joint Commission conducted a survey of the 2010 revisions to its Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Person Surgery, and results show widespread support of the revisions, according to The Joint Commission report.
Revisions to The Joint Commission's Universal Protocol include simplified pre-procedural verification requirements, clarification on site-marking requirements and streamlined time-out and documentation procedures. More than 2,100 respondents completed the survey, which was meant to determine organizations' ability to implement the revisions.
Results from the survey include the following:
• Eighty-eight percent of surveyed individuals agreed or strongly agreed that their organizations were able to fully implement the revisions.
• Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the preprocedure verification requirements were appropriate.
• Eighty-seven percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the site-marking requirements were appropriate.
• Eighty-nine percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the time-out procedure requirements were appropriate.
• Ninety-three percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that there is a benefit in using the Universal Protocol in ASCs.
Read The Joint Commission's report about its findings about the Universal Protocol survey (pdf).
Read other coverage about the Universal Protocol:
- Joint Commission Updates Universal Protocol
- Best Practices to Meet the Top 10 Joint Commission Standards With the Highest Non-Compliance Rates
Revisions to The Joint Commission's Universal Protocol include simplified pre-procedural verification requirements, clarification on site-marking requirements and streamlined time-out and documentation procedures. More than 2,100 respondents completed the survey, which was meant to determine organizations' ability to implement the revisions.
Results from the survey include the following:
• Eighty-eight percent of surveyed individuals agreed or strongly agreed that their organizations were able to fully implement the revisions.
• Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the preprocedure verification requirements were appropriate.
• Eighty-seven percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the site-marking requirements were appropriate.
• Eighty-nine percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the time-out procedure requirements were appropriate.
• Ninety-three percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that there is a benefit in using the Universal Protocol in ASCs.
Read The Joint Commission's report about its findings about the Universal Protocol survey (pdf).
Read other coverage about the Universal Protocol:
- Joint Commission Updates Universal Protocol
- Best Practices to Meet the Top 10 Joint Commission Standards With the Highest Non-Compliance Rates